California Supreme Court hears case that could impact future of death penalty – CBS San Francisco

SAN QUENTIN (KPIX 5) – The California Supreme Court began hearing arguments Wednesday in Donte McDaniel’s death sentence appeal, a case that legal experts say could impact the future of capital punishment in the state.

McDaniel’s case could make it harder for prosecutors to put people on death row in California and almost all inmates could be affected.

READ MORE: Windsor Council appoints Deputy Mayor Sam Salmon to replace Dominic Foppoli

One of 700 convicted inmates in San Quentin, McDaniel was convicted of two murders in 2004, following a gang-related drug case when he was 24.

The inmate’s attorneys focus on what are known as “aggravating factors,” 22 different things such as gang activity, whether the perpetrator was waiting, or whether the crime was particularly heinous or cruel.

Lara Bazelon, a law professor at the University of San Francisco, said current law requires jurors to agree there was an aggravating factor, not a specific factor.

“Lawyers say jurors must agree on the specific aggravating factors that cause them to die beyond a reasonable doubt and the law does not require them to do so now,” Bazelon told KPIX 5.

This is what the governor and public defenders want to change, making the death penalty more difficult to impose.

READ MORE: East Palo Alto pledges $ 2 million to help mobile home park residents buy their lots

Bazelon believes the composition of the tribunal at the moment means that this change has a real chance of happening.

“We now have ground that slopes to the left. There are people appointed by Jerry Brown on this tribunal. There are people named by Gavin Newsom on this tribunal, ”the professor said. “And litigants might think there will be a more receptive audience to attacks on the constitutionality of the death penalty.”

Bazelon said she doesn’t necessarily believe the California Supreme Court’s ruling will be retroactive and apply to anyone already on death row.

“They might say ‘yes there is a problem with this death sentence’ but everyone who came before this decision is not benefiting from it, they are stuck with their death sentence,” she said. “It’s just going forward prospectively, the defendants will benefit.”

The professor said it was really unclear what the court would do to make any changes retroactive.

Ultimately, district attorneys would decide whether to retry the sentencing phase in all of these convictions. But many ADs sided with the governor in favor of this change.

NO MORE NEWS: A’s Shut Out Mariners; Manager Bob Melvin wins 800th with Oakland

A decision from the California Supreme Court is expected within the next three to six months.

Source link

About Norman Griggs

Check Also

(Video) Iran: Ebrahim Raisi’s planned speech at the UN is a threat to human rights

(NCRI) and (OMPI / MEK Iran): UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has underlined the continued lack …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *